Since you clearly do not accept the Creator God of the Bible, then with respect, you have no basis for doing science and knowing whether any observations you make are reliable.
The term “creation scientist” is hardly an oxymoron, because the scientific method can only be consistently used by those who accept that the Creator God of the Bible does not change.
He is not capricious but has put order and regularity into His creation, and He is a reliable eyewitness of what happened in the past as recorded in the Bible.
Indeed, the early chapters of the Bible provide a sober historical narrative of the events that shaped the earth’s history.
In the Bible, we have the eyewitness testimony of someone who has been present throughout all of history and who has told us what happened.In order to link the evidence to the accused, the scientists make assumptions, and then they build their interpretations on those assumptions.You can find many other articles on our website that discuss these issues.They have come from somewhere else in the solar system, and their source is assumed to have formed at the same time as the earth.Therefore, the age they supply is an interpretation based on that assumption and is emphatically not “irrefutable proof.” How do we know for sure that the meteorites came from another body in the solar system that was formed at the same time as the earth?On the other hand, the court testimonies of forensic scientists are subjected to intense scrutiny, because they do not constitute proof.