Radiometric dating proved wrong

Radiometric dating remains a reliable scientific method.For articles on the RATE project, see the Rate Index.Because your computer is running an older version of internet browser, it no longer meets the features of modern websites.You can help Amazing Discoveries reduce costs by upgrading or replacing your internet browser with one of the options below.If the clock is not set to zero when a deposit forms, then there can be no starting point from which to calculate the age of a deposit.It is assumed that we are dealing with a closed system—no loss of either parent or daughter elements has occurred since the study material formed.

radiometric dating proved wrong-49radiometric dating proved wrong-76radiometric dating proved wrong-84

Carbon-14 comes from nitrogen and is independent of the carbon-12 reservoir.d) Even if the rate of decay is constant, without knowledge of the exact ratio of carbon-12 to carbon-14in the initial sample, the dating technique is subject to question.It's assumed that the clock was set to zero when the study material was formed.In the study on the Hawaii lava flow cited above, it was argued that entrapment of excessive amounts of argon gas had made the samples appear older than they were. Radiometric dating techniques are thus based on sound scientific principles, but rely on so many basic assumptions that Bible believers need not have their faith shattered by data derived from these techniques. However, conditions may have been different in the past and could have influenced the rate of decay or formation of radioactive elements.

You must have an account to comment. Please register or login here!